Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Samaritan Woman by the Well

April 10th 2008 02:26
Last post, I said that I had two favourite gospel stories. They both involved Samaritans. They both included revolutionary ideas. I have already addressed one of those stories, the parable of the Good Samaritan. Now I turn my attention to the other revolutionary Samaritan story, the Samaritan woman by the well.

As mentioned previously, Jews did not like Samaritan. Jews would not talk to Samaritans if they could help it. Another thing we have to know about Jews in Jesus’ day is that they would rarely talk to women they didn’t know. If the woman was alone, talking to her was virtually unheard of.


So here’s Jesus, by the well. The disciples have gone off and left him, so he’s alone. Here’s the Samaritan woman. She’s also alone. That in itself was unusual. Why would she come to the well alone? Most women came with a group of other women. Although it’s not stated, it undoubtedly had something to do with the long line of husbands she had had and the fact that she was living with a man without being married to her. It appeared the other women shunned her.

What would Jesus do in this situation? Any well-respected teacher of the law would tell him the best thing he could do was hightail it out of there. But Jesus doesn’t leave. Jesus does something revolutionary. Jesus speaks to her – and not only speaks to her, but asks her for water. It was disgraceful behaviour. But because it was Jesus doing it, we also know it was the right behaviour.

Thankfully, here in the Western world, we don’t have nearly as many unwritten regulations and customs as the Jews in Jesus’ day did. But some churches and Christians make their own set of unwritten laws. Some more so than others. Don’t be alone with a woman. Stay away from women of ill repute. Don’t ask people of other religions for help. Condemn sin whenever and wherever possible.


See, that was the other revolutionary thing that Jesus did. As soon as he saw the Samaritan woman, he would have known of her past and current living arrangements. But he didn’t condemn her. Now, don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to suggest that he approved of her many husbands. He didn’t tell her that was she was doing was fine. But nor did he spend any time making her feel guilty.

Instead he offers her living water. What? Why on earth would he do that? I think he did it because he recognised that her past marriages and partners had little to do with willful disobedience with God’s commands and more to do with an inner pain. It reflected a deep spiritual thirst. Until that thirst was satisfied, she would never change. He didn’t just care about changing her behaviour. He wanted to help and love her.

Jesus said that the two most important commandments were loving God and loving others. This story reflects this attitude. Loving people is more important than rules or regulations. Loving people is more important than condemning sin. Loving people should come first. It was revolutionary then. Unfortunately, in some Christian circles, it’s still a pretty revolutionary idea now.
89
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Recent Posts:
      God in Bon Jovi songs 
      What's your purpose? 
      Saints and Prime Ministers 
      Fear 
      Sisters 
Comments
2 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by S. L. Bradish

April 10th 2008 03:29
There is a fine line between "loving the sinner" and accepting the sin. You can love the sinner who is a child molestor, but you don't let him baby sit your kids. You can love the sinner who is a rapist, but you don't leave him alone with a young girl. You can love the sinner who is a thief, but you don't ask him to carry your bank card. Reaching out to others is a good thing. Jesus taught us to do that. But He never said to put yourself in the position of being victimized by those who have evil intent. It's a very fine line.

Comment by samaritan

April 10th 2008 03:36
Obviously you have to set boundaries when dealing with people that have particular problems. I think that can often be a hard thing for people to know when to draw that line - particularly if it's in the case of people who are very close to you, like say adult children. But whether you trust someone or not is completely different to whether you judge and condemn them or not. You can love and help someone - without judgement or condemnation - but still be sensible about the kind of things you're trusting them with.





Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
14 Posts
14 Posts
90 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

samaritan's Blogs

189 Vote(s)
13 Comment(s)
4 Post(s)
Moderated by samaritan
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]